Atoms
NCERT Chapter 12 • Rutherford & Bohr Models, Hydrogen Spectrum
1. Thomson’s Plum Pudding Model
Proposed in 1898, J.J. Thomson suggested that an atom is a uniform sphere of positive charge with electrons embedded in it — like “plums in a pudding”. This model was later disproved by Rutherford’s alpha-scattering experiment.
2. Rutherford’s Nuclear Model
The alpha-particle scattering experiment (Geiger-Marsden, 1911) led Rutherford to propose the nuclear model of the atom.
- Most α-particles passed through undeflected → atom is mostly empty space.
- A few scattered at large angles → concentrated positive charge.
- About 1 in 8000 deflected by >90° → nucleus is tiny but massive.
At this distance, kinetic energy = electrostatic potential energy:
→
.
The perpendicular distance between the initial velocity vector of the α-particle and the center of the nucleus.
– Small
– Large
3. Failure of Rutherford’s Model
- Instability: Accelerated electrons should radiate energy and spiral into the nucleus in ~10⁻¹⁰ s. But atoms are stable.
- Continuous Spectrum: Spiraling electrons would emit a continuous range of frequencies. But atoms emit only discrete spectral lines.
4. Bohr’s Model of Hydrogen Atom
To resolve these issues, Niels Bohr (1913) proposed a quantum model for hydrogen.
- Stable Orbits: Electrons revolve in stable circular orbits without radiating energy (“stationary states”).
- Quantisation Condition: Angular momentum is quantised:
(
). - Photon Emission/Absorption: Radiation occurs only during transitions:
.
5. Derivations: Radius, Velocity & Energy
Derivation: Radius of
Orbit (
)
Centripetal force = Electrostatic force:
From Bohr’s second postulate:
Substitute
For Hydrogen (
For Hydrogenic atoms:
Derivation: Total Energy (
)
From (i),
For Hydrogen atom:
For Hydrogenic atoms:
– Ground state (
): ![]()
– Ionisation energy =
(energy to remove electron to
)
6. Atomic Spectra (Hydrogen Series)
When an electron jumps from higher level
to lower level
, a photon is emitted with:

where
| Series | Transition ( |
Region |
|---|---|---|
| Lyman | Ultraviolet | |
| Balmer | Visible | |
| Paschen | Infrared | |
| Brackett | Infrared | |
| Pfund | Far Infrared |
7. de Broglie’s Explanation of Bohr’s Postulate
Louis de Broglie (1923) explained Bohr’s quantization using matter waves.
Circumference =
Using de Broglie relation
This justifies Bohr’s second postulate.
8. Limitations of Bohr’s Model
- Only works for hydrogenic atoms (H, He⁺, Li²⁺).
- Fails for multi-electron atoms (ignores electron-electron repulsion).
- Cannot explain fine structure of spectral lines.
- Does not predict relative intensities of spectral lines.
- Contradicts Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle (fixed orbits imply known position & momentum).
- Bohr’s fixed orbits contradict Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle — electrons don’t have definite trajectories in quantum mechanics (leads to Schrödinger wave mechanics).
Calculate energy levels and spectral lines: Chapter 12 Important Questions →
